linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 01/16] drivers: pwm: core: use a single of xlate function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b928d56f-8eb6-c23e-99bd-c4089e80f923@microchip.com>
Date:   Thu, 18 Jan 2018 11:11:16 +0200
From:   Claudiu Beznea <Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com>
To:     Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
CC:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
        Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
        Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
        <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mike Dunn <mikedunn@...sguy.com>,
        Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@...l.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/16] drivers: pwm: core: use a single of xlate
 function



On 18.01.2018 01:14, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 10:24:59AM +0200, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
>> Please explain me further. From this I understand, as a general rule,
>> that the device tree binaries from, e.g. 3 years ago, should be
>> compatible with, e.g. the current version of kernel?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ABI.txt
> 
I agree, I found that after some research.

Thanks,
Claudiu