lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2a4c4e77-b27f-1537-515c-5ac7644c4768@amd.com>
Date:   Wed, 17 Jan 2018 17:47:11 -0600
From:   Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
To:     x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
        Yu Chen <yu.c.chen@...el.com>, Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
        Rui Zhang <rui.zhang@...el.com>, ebiederm@...hat.com,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm: Rework wbinvd, hlt operation in stop_this_cpu()

On 1/17/2018 5:41 PM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> Some issues have been reported with the for loop in stop_this_cpu() that
> issues the 'wbinvd; hlt' sequence.  Reverting this sequence to halt()
> has been shown to resolve the issue.
> 
> However, the wbinvd is needed when running with SME.  The reason for the
> wbinvd is to prevent cache flush races between encrypted and non-encrypted
> entries that have the same physical address.  This can occur when
> kexec'ing from memory encryption active to inactive or vice-versa.  The
> important thing is to not have outside of kernel text memory references
> (such as stack usage), so the usage of the native_*() functions is needed
> since these expand as inline asm sequences.  So instead of reverting the
> change, rework the sequence.
> 
> Move the wbinvd instruction outside of the for loop as native_wbinvd()
> and make its execution conditional on X86_FEATURE_SME.  In the for loop,
> change the asm 'wbinvd; hlt' sequence back to a halt sequence but use
> the native_halt() call.
> 
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 4.14.x
> Fixes: bba4ed011a52 ("x86/mm, kexec: Allow kexec to be used with SME")
> Reported-by: Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>

Dave,

Can you test this and see if it resolves your issue?

Thanks,
Tom

> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/process.c |   25 +++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> index 63711fe..03408b9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> @@ -379,19 +379,24 @@ void stop_this_cpu(void *dummy)
>  	disable_local_APIC();
>  	mcheck_cpu_clear(this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_info));
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Use wbinvd on processors that support SME. This provides support
> +	 * for performing a successful kexec when going from SME inactive
> +	 * to SME active (or vice-versa). The cache must be cleared so that
> +	 * if there are entries with the same physical address, both with and
> +	 * without the encryption bit, they don't race each other when flushed
> +	 * and potentially end up with the wrong entry being committed to
> +	 * memory.
> +	 */
> +	if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SME))
> +		native_wbinvd();
>  	for (;;) {
>  		/*
> -		 * Use wbinvd followed by hlt to stop the processor. This
> -		 * provides support for kexec on a processor that supports
> -		 * SME. With kexec, going from SME inactive to SME active
> -		 * requires clearing cache entries so that addresses without
> -		 * the encryption bit set don't corrupt the same physical
> -		 * address that has the encryption bit set when caches are
> -		 * flushed. To achieve this a wbinvd is performed followed by
> -		 * a hlt. Even if the processor is not in the kexec/SME
> -		 * scenario this only adds a wbinvd to a halting processor.
> +		 * Use native_halt() so that memory contents don't change
> +		 * (stack usage and variables) after possibly issuing the
> +		 * native_wbinvd() above.
>  		 */
> -		asm volatile("wbinvd; hlt" : : : "memory");
> +		native_halt();
>  	}
>  }
>  
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ