linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/5] Expand the INIT_SIGNALS and INIT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1801171214120.1777@nanos>
Date:   Wed, 17 Jan 2018 12:14:50 +0100 (CET)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
cc:     linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] Expand the INIT_SIGNALS and INIT_SIGHAND macros and
 remove

On Tue, 2 Jan 2018, David Howells wrote:

> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> 
> > >  #define INIT_CPU_TIMERS(s)						\
> > ...
> > That macro is only used in init_task.c Why not moving it there and get rid
> > of the whole macro maze in the header file?
> 
> The reason I didn't get rid of it is that it's got more than one expansion
> point.  Same for INIT_PREV_CPUTIME and INIT_PID_LINK.

Ah, sorry I missed that. So yes, the current patch is fine.

Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>