[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <c80554d9-a7e0-00cf-9f03-b16ce34205c5@de.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 12:14:52 +0100
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
Marcus Meissner <meissner@...e.de>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] s390: add system call to run tasks with modified
branch prediction
On 01/17/2018 11:03 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 01/17/2018 10:48 AM, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
>> rc = syscall(__NR_s390_modify_bp);
>> if (rc) {
>> perror("s390_modify_bp");
>> exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
>> }
>
> Isn't this traditionally done through personality or prctl?
I think we want this per thread (and not per process). So I assume personality
will not work out. Can a prctl be done per thread?
>
> This looks like something other architectures may want as well.
Probably.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists