[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5A60AB1D.9080002@rock-chips.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 22:11:41 +0800
From: JeffyChen <jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tfiga@...omium.org
CC: jcliang@...omium.org, xxm@...k-chips.com,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/13] iommu/rockchip: Use iopoll helpers to wait for
hardware
Hi Robin,
On 01/18/2018 09:09 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> -#define FORCE_RESET_TIMEOUT 100 /* ms */
>> +#define FORCE_RESET_TIMEOUT 100000 /* us */
>> +#define POLL_TIMEOUT 1000 /* us */
>
> Nit: the callsites look a bit odd with the combination of POLL_TIMEOUT
> and the magic number 100 - should we not also define something like
> POLL_PERIOD for that? Also POLL_TIMEOUT is a rather generic name and
> overlaps with several other drivers, so a namespace prefix would be
> helpful (i.e. RK_IOMMU_POLL*, or at least RK_POLL*).
>
> FWIW, my personal preference would be to also suffix these with _US for
> absolute clarity, but it's not essential (especially if longer names
> lead to more linebreaks at the callsites).
right, that make sense, will fix it in next version, thanks :)
>
> With those undocumented "100"s fixed up,
>
> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists