[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5A60ADBD.4050303@rock-chips.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 22:22:53 +0800
From: JeffyChen <jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC: jcliang@...omium.org, xxm@...k-chips.com, tfiga@...omium.org,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/13] iommu/rockchip: Fix error handling in attach
Hi Robin,
On 01/18/2018 09:23 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
>>
>> @@ -837,7 +837,7 @@ static int rk_iommu_attach_device(struct
>> iommu_domain *domain,
>> ret = rk_iommu_enable_paging(iommu);
>> if (ret)
>> - return ret;
>> + goto err_disable_stall;
>> spin_lock_irqsave(&rk_domain->iommus_lock, flags);
>> list_add_tail(&iommu->node, &rk_domain->iommus);
>> @@ -848,6 +848,11 @@ static int rk_iommu_attach_device(struct
>> iommu_domain *domain,
>> rk_iommu_disable_stall(iommu);
>> return 0;
>
> Nit: if you like, it looks reasonable to name the label
> "out_disable_stall" and remove these lines above here, to save the
> duplication between the error and success paths (since ret will already
> be 0 on the latter).
>
right, i think so, will do it in the next version.
> Either way,
>
> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists