[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4a6681a7-5ed6-ad9c-5d1d-73f1fcc82f3d@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 06:38:10 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hannes@...xchg.org,
iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, mgorman@...hsingularity.net,
tony.luck@...el.com, vbabka@...e.cz, mhocko@...nel.org,
aarcange@...hat.com, hillf.zj@...baba-inc.com, hughd@...gle.com,
oleg@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, riel@...hat.com,
srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, vdavydov.dev@...il.com,
mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [mm 4.15-rc8] Random oopses under memory pressure.
On 01/18/2018 05:12 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> - if (pte_page(*pvmw->pte) - pvmw->page >=
> - hpage_nr_pages(pvmw->page)) {
Is ->pte guaranteed to map a page which is within the same section as
pvmw->page? Otherwise, with sparsemem (non-vmemmap), the pointer
arithmetic won't work.
WARN_ON_ONCE(page_to_section(pvmw->page) !=
page_to_section(pte_page(*pvmw->pte));
Will detect that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists