[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180119003652.9842ce209b3b4aa72eb0c79e@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:36:52 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: mhiramat@...nel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 tip/master 0/3] kprobes/x86: retpoline: Fix kprobes
for retpoline
On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 05:01:57 -0800
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > Side effect: [1/3] will move __x86_indirect_thunk_* functions
> > in kernel text area. Of course those functions were in the
> > .text area, but placed in right after _etext. This just moves
> > it right before the _etext.
>
> I assume you tested that with page table isolation on?
>
> The thunks need to be accessible from the trampoline.
Yes, I've tested the kernel with CONFIG_PAGE_TABLE_ISOLATION=y.
As David pointed, maybe all those points are using JMP/CALL_NOSPEC macro directly?
Thanks,
>
> -Andi
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists