[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180118185015.GF7844@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 10:50:15 -0800
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 tip/master 0/3] kprobes/x86: retpoline: Fix kprobes
for retpoline
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 02:03:07PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-01-18 at 05:01 -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > >
> > > Side effect: [1/3] will move __x86_indirect_thunk_* functions
> > > in kernel text area. Of course those functions were in the
> > > .text area, but placed in right after _etext. This just moves
> > > it right before the _etext.
> > I assume you tested that with page table isolation on?
> >
> > The thunks need to be accessible from the trampoline.
>
> I thought we put it inline in the trampoline.
Yes we did, just want to make sure everything still works.
If it's tested that's fine
-Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists