lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <439098cb-7342-39c4-1999-41573f4897b7@prevas.dk>
Date:   Fri, 19 Jan 2018 11:53:28 +0100
From:   Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@...vas.dk>
To:     Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
CC:     <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: ls1021a: add nodes for on-chip ram

On 2018-01-03 16:45, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> Although the two nodes constitute one contiguous 128K region, still
> describe them separately:
> 
> - That's how they are described in the reference manual: "Each OCRAM
>   occupies a 64 KB of address region...", and the names ocram1 and
>   ocram2 are also as used in the manual.
> 
> - The two areas are treated differently by the boot ROM code: OCRAM2 is
>   zero-initialized, while, again quoting the RM, "software must perform
>   the zero initialization of OCRAM1."

ping

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ