[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180119100728.78ae773f@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 10:07:28 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] tools lib traceevent: Install fixes
On Fri, 19 Jan 2018 11:37:13 +0100
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> wrote:
> hi,
> I checked on this one and was surprised last email is from 2016 ;-)
> so we did not move much with this.. is there still will to do that?
>
> I think we were kind of waiting for the namespace changes in
> traceevent library.. like to have some common prefix for public
> functions/struct, like 'traceevent_' ?
>
> thoughts? thanks,
Yes, actually this is back on my radar. I now have full time staff
working on trace-cmd and kernelshark. One of the up coming changes is
to start pushing libtraceevent as a real library which means changing
this.
Thus, do we think "traceevent_" is the proper naming? Could we shorten
it to "tevent_"? Need to get this bike-shedding exercise out of the way
first ;-)
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists