[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1801202054210.1998@nanos>
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2018 20:59:50 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirsky <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bpetkov@...e.de>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, keescook@...gle.com,
hughd@...gle.com, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <eduval@...zon.com>, aliguori@...zon.com,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, daniel.gruss@...k.tugraz.at,
neil.berrington@...acore.com
Subject: Re: [patch 00/60] x86/kpti: Kernel Page Table Isolation (was
KAISER)
On Fri, 19 Jan 2018, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Should KPTI have a MAINTAINERS entry?
I don't think so. It's all x86 core code which has a maintainer entry.
> Neil Berrington (cc'ed) is reporting "Double fault in load_new_mm_cr3 with KPTI
> enabled" at https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198517
Neil, the screenshot shows that this is on a ubuntu 4.13 something
kernel. Can you reproduce on 4.14.14 or on Linus latest ?
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists