[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1801202107300.1998@nanos>
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2018 21:08:11 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>
cc: arjan@...ux.intel.com, karahmed@...zon.de, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com,
bp@...en8.de, peterz@...radead.org, pbonzini@...hat.com,
ak@...ux.intel.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
gregkh@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86/pti: Do not enable PTI on fixed Intel
processors
On Sat, 20 Jan 2018, David Woodhouse wrote:
> When they advertise the IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES MSR and it has the RDCL_NO
> bit set, they don't need KPTI either.
Do they exist today? And do we have documentation for that new MSR already?
Thanks,
tglx
> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 9 +++++++--
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> index e5d66e9..80572ae 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> @@ -900,8 +900,13 @@ static void __init early_identify_cpu(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
>
> setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_ALWAYS);
>
> - if (c->x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_AMD)
> - setup_force_cpu_bug(X86_BUG_CPU_MELTDOWN);
> + if (c->x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_AMD) {
> + unsigned long ia32_cap = 0;
> + if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_ARCH_CAPABILITIES))
> + rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES, ia32_cap);
> + if (!(ia32_cap & ARCH_CAP_RDCL_NO))
> + setup_force_cpu_bug(X86_BUG_CPU_MELTDOWN);
> + }
>
> setup_force_cpu_bug(X86_BUG_SPECTRE_V1);
> setup_force_cpu_bug(X86_BUG_SPECTRE_V2);
> --
> 2.7.4
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists