[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180121011402.9557-1-labbott@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2018 17:14:02 -0800
From: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Cc: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] x86: Use __nostackprotect for sme_encrypt_kernel
Commit bacf6b499e11 ("x86/mm: Use a struct to reduce parameters for
SME PGD mapping") moved some parameters into a structure. The
structure was large enough to trigger the stack protection canary
in sme_encrypt_kernel which doesn't work this early, causing reboots.
Mark sme_encrypt_kernel appropriately to not use the canary.
Fixes: bacf6b499e11 ("x86/mm: Use a struct to reduce parameters for
SME PGD mapping")
Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
---
I hadn't seen this picked up yet so sending explicitly
---
arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
index 3ef362f598e3..e1d61e8500f9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
@@ -738,7 +738,7 @@ static unsigned long __init sme_pgtable_calc(unsigned long len)
return total;
}
-void __init sme_encrypt_kernel(struct boot_params *bp)
+void __init __nostackprotector sme_encrypt_kernel(struct boot_params *bp)
{
unsigned long workarea_start, workarea_end, workarea_len;
unsigned long execute_start, execute_end, execute_len;
--
2.15.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists