linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86/cpufeatures: Add AMD feature bits for Prediction Command

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180121123454.zjgqcf7opft2hfu7@pd.tnic>
Date:   Sun, 21 Jan 2018 13:34:54 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc:     David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>, arjan@...ux.intel.com,
        tglx@...utronix.de, karahmed@...zon.de, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com,
        peterz@...radead.org, pbonzini@...hat.com, ak@...ux.intel.com,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, gregkh@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86/cpufeatures: Add AMD feature bits for Prediction
 Command

On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 12:22:47PM -0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Yeah, that's fat-fingered in a cut/paste in refactoring. Fixed in what I
> posted this morning.

Hmm, I better switch to v2 then. With the crazy amount of patchsets
flying around, I could use an explicit invalidation of previous ones :-)

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.