linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] USB: serial: f81232: clear overrun flag

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1516615597.7580.7.camel@suse.com>
Date:   Mon, 22 Jan 2018 11:06:37 +0100
From:   Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>
To:     "Ji-Ze Hong (Peter Hong)" <hpeter@...il.com>, johan@...nel.org
Cc:     peter_hong@...tek.com.tw,
        "Ji-Ze Hong (Peter Hong)" <hpeter+linux_kernel@...il.com>,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] USB: serial: f81232: clear overrun flag

Am Montag, den 22.01.2018, 15:58 +0800 schrieb  Ji-Ze Hong (Peter Hong)
:
> The F81232 will report data and LSR with bulk like following format:
> bulk-in data: [LSR(1Byte)+DATA(1Byte)][LSR(1Byte)+DATA(1Byte)]...
> 
> LSR will auto clear frame/parity/break error flag when reading by H/W,
> but overrrun will only cleared when reading LSR. So this patch add a
> worker to read LSR when OE.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ji-Ze Hong (Peter Hong) <hpeter+linux_kernel@...il.com>
[..] 
> +static void f81232_lsr_worker(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> +	struct f81232_private *priv;
> +	struct usb_serial_port *port;
> +	int status;
> +	u8 tmp;
> +
> +	priv = container_of(work, struct f81232_private, lsr_work);
> +	port = priv->port;
> +
> +	status = f81232_get_register(port, LINE_STATUS_REGISTER, &tmp);
> +	if (status)
> +		dev_warn(&port->dev, "read LSR failed: %d\n", status);
> +}

Hi,

I am afraid this is incomplete. You are scheduling a work that does IO.
Hence you must cancel that work when the driver is unbound from the
interface. You must also not do IO like this while the system is suspending.

	Regards
		Oliver