[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <be217e52-8260-7680-9a37-d01cd2d1afb8@st.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 14:39:46 +0000
From: Philippe CORNU <philippe.cornu@...com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
CC: Yannick FERTRE <yannick.fertre@...com>,
Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org>,
Vincent ABRIOU <vincent.abriou@...com>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"Maxime Coquelin" <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Mickael REULIER" <mickael.reulier@...com>,
Gabriel FERNANDEZ <gabriel.fernandez@...com>,
Ludovic BARRE <ludovic.barre@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: display: stm32: correct clock-names in dsi
panel example
Hi Rob,
On 01/22/2018 03:30 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 2:58 PM, Philippe Cornu <philippe.cornu@...com> wrote:
>> In the dsi panel example, clock names in the "clock-names"
>> field have been swapped:
>> * "pclk" (peripheral clock) is <&rcc 1 CLK_F469_DSI> on stm32f4
>> * "ref" (dsi phy pll ref clock) is <&clk_hse> on stm32f4
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Cornu <philippe.cornu@...com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/st,stm32-ltdc.txt | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/st,stm32-ltdc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/st,stm32-ltdc.txt
>> index 029252253ad4..3eb1b48b47dd 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/st,stm32-ltdc.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/st,stm32-ltdc.txt
>> @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ Example 2: DSI panel
>> compatible = "st,stm32-dsi";
>> reg = <0x40016c00 0x800>;
>> clocks = <&rcc 1 CLK_F469_DSI>, <&clk_hse>;
>> - clock-names = "ref", "pclk";
>> + clock-names = "pclk", "ref";
>
> There is no way to tell they are reversed because pclk is not even
> documented. Please fix that too.
>
Many thanks for your review.
pclk is already described in the generic part
(Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/dw_mipi_dsi.txt).
In st,stm32-ltdc.txt (specific part), I have documented: "For all
mandatory properties & nodes, please refer to the related documentation
in [5]".
Do you think it is clear enough?
Many thanks,
Philippe :-)
>> resets = <&rcc STM32F4_APB2_RESET(DSI)>;
>> reset-names = "apb";
>>
>> --
>> 2.15.1
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists