linux-kernel - Re: [net-next: PATCH v4 0/7] Armada 7k/8k PP2 ACPI support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPv3WKey+JHrgasLigMFH5vAdjfz0Z18z0BVF1AQ_poV5CgQbg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 22 Jan 2018 17:09:29 +0100
From:   Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Antoine Ténart <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
        Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
        Gregory Clément 
        <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
        Stefan Chulski <stefanc@...vell.com>, nadavh@...vell.com,
        Neta Zur Hershkovits <neta@...vell.com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        Grzegorz Jaszczyk <jaz@...ihalf.com>,
        Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next: PATCH v4 0/7] Armada 7k/8k PP2 ACPI support

2018-01-22 16:57 GMT+01:00 David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>:
> From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 15:43:42 +0100
>
>> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 09:35:25AM -0500, David Miller wrote:
>>> From: Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>
>>> Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 14:00:37 +0100
>>>
>>> > There's a discussion about the ACPI vs generic MDIO/PHY change under
>>> > initial version of the patchset, however the patches in question were
>>> > for now abandoned from further re-sends.
>>>
>>> But doesn't the results of that discussion determine whether the way ACPI
>>> is being used in this patch series is what we want to do or not?
>>
>> Hi David
>>
>> The patches submitted here don't involve any ACPI for MDIO or PHY. It
>> is all MAC. And it is using standard ACPI primitives for devices,
>> nothing new.
>>
>> It is not setting any precedence for MDIO and PHY. That is totally out
>> of scope for these patches. Whatever is decided for MDIO and PHY can
>> be added later.
>
> Thanks for all of the clarifications.
>
> Series applied to net-next, thank you.

Great, thanks!