lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 23 Jan 2018 17:18:44 -0800
From:   Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:     Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
Cc:     Alberto Ponces <ponces26@...il.com>,
        "linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] platform/x86: silead_dmi: Add touchscreen platform
 data for the Teclast X3 Plus tablet

On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 05:02:59PM -0800, Darren Hart wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 04:37:43PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 3:27 PM, Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 06:33:38PM +0000, Alberto Ponces wrote:
> > >> Add touchscreen platform data for the Teclast X3 Plus tablet.
> > >>
> > >> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Alberto Ponces <ponces26@...il.com>
> > >
> > > Queued, thanks.
> > >
> > > Note for the future: Author signoff goes first, then reviewers, then committer.
> > 
> > In this case Alberto was the committer, so his sign-off is last, as it
> > should be. Any reported-by, suggested-by, acked-by or reviewed-by he
> > collected should go above his sign-off. Once you picked up his patch
> > you 'll become committer, so any markings you add should go between
> > his sign-off and yours.
> 
> Of course, you're correct. Thank you for the correction - and Alberto, apologies
> for the noise/confusion.
> 
> Dmitry, I reviewed documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst and
> 5.Posting.rst and didn't find this clearly defined. Have I missed where this is
> documented, or is an update in order?

I do not think is was ever stated explicitly, the closest comes "14) The
canonical patch format" which states that sign off goes before the ---
divider.

I think it comes naturally if you consider patch vs pull request: if you
decided to pull from Alberto's tree (or anyone else's tree) instead of
taking the patch via email, then if they'd put non-sign-off tags after
the sign-off, they'd end up in your and then Linus' tree like that, as
you would not add your sign-off when doing git merge.

But if you believe this should be called explicitly then adding a few
more words to section 14 should work.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ