[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180125065057.GC24052@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 07:50:57 +0100
From: "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: "Zhang, Ning A" <ning.a.zhang@...el.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: backport Rewrite sync_core() to use IRET-to-self to stable
kernels?
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
A: No.
Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?
http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 02:22:57AM +0000, Zhang, Ning A wrote:
> When Linux runs as a guest OS, CPUID is privileged instruction, sync_core() will be very slow.
>
> If apply this patch, 200ms will be saved for kernel initial, when Linux runs as a guest OS.
That's not a regression. Why not just use a newer kernel release if you
want to get the feature of "faster boot"? :)
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists