linux-kernel - RE: backport Rewrite sync_core() to use IRET-to-self to stable kernels?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <027FCDD209E4CC4181A7B9D5DBB880575FDDBC11@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 25 Jan 2018 02:22:57 +0000
From:   "Zhang, Ning A" <ning.a.zhang@...el.com>
To:     "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: backport Rewrite sync_core() to use IRET-to-self to stable
 kernels?

When Linux runs as a guest OS, CPUID is privileged instruction, sync_core() will be very slow.

If apply this patch, 200ms will be saved for kernel initial, when Linux runs as a guest OS.

BR.
Ning.

-----Original Message-----
From: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org [mailto:gregkh@...uxfoundation.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2018 5:01 PM
To: Zhang, Ning A <ning.a.zhang@...el.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>; tglx@...utronix.de; stable@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: backport Rewrite sync_core() to use IRET-to-self to stable kernels?

On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 08:19:44AM +0000, Zhang, Ning A wrote:
> Thanks Greg, Andy
> 
> How about c198b121b1a1d7a7171770c634cd49191bac4477?

Why do you think that is needed in the older stable kernels?  What problem does it solve?  Do any distros have this patch in their kernels?

thanks,

greg k-h