[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <67E8EB67-EB60-441E-BDFB-521F3D431400@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 14:09:40 -0800
From: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Mazur <krzysiek@...lesie.net>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:MEMORY MANAGEMENT" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <eduval@...zon.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, aliguori@...zon.com,
daniel.gruss@...k.tugraz.at, hughd@...gle.com, keescook@...gle.com,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/16] PTI support for x86-32
Krzysztof Mazur <krzysiek@...lesie.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 05:36:43PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
>> From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> here is my current WIP code to enable PTI on x86-32. It is
>> still in a pretty early state, but it successfully boots my
>> KVM guest with PAE and with legacy paging. The existing PTI
>> code for x86-64 already prepares a lot of the stuff needed
>> for 32 bit too, thanks for that to all the people involved
>> in its development :)
>
> Hi,
>
> I've waited for this patches for a long time, until I've tried to
> exploit meltdown on some old 32-bit CPUs and failed. Pentium M
> seems to speculatively execute the second load with eax
> always equal to 0:
>
> movzx (%[addr]), %%eax
> shl $12, %%eax
> movzx (%[target], %%eax), %%eax
>
> And on Pentium 4-based Xeon the second load seems to be never executed,
> even without shift (shifts are slow on some or all Pentium 4's). Maybe
> not all P6 and Netbursts CPUs are affected, but I'm not sure. Maybe the
> kernel, at least on 32-bit, should try to exploit meltdown to test if
> the CPU is really affected.
The PoC apparently does not work with 3GB of memory or more on 32-bit. Does
you setup has more? Can you try the attack while setting max_addr=1G ?
Thanks,
Nadav
Powered by blists - more mailing lists