linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 06/16] rcuperf: Set gp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPtJFC+twW_MM1z+-7QFDRoWBHU38dGrVWmTA1oEg+G8=w82Pg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 26 Jan 2018 08:33:16 +0000
From:   Lihao Liang <lihao.liang@...il.com>
To:     Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     "Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo)" <guohanjun@...wei.com>, heng.z@...wei.com,
        hb.chen@...wei.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 06/16] rcuperf: Set gp_exp to true for tests to run

On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 6:18 AM, Paul E. McKenney
<paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 03:59:31PM +0800, lianglihao@...wei.com wrote:
>> From: Lihao Liang <lianglihao@...wei.com>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lihao Liang <lianglihao@...wei.com>
>> ---
>>  kernel/rcu/rcuperf.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcuperf.c b/kernel/rcu/rcuperf.c
>> index ea80fa3e..baccc123 100644
>> --- a/kernel/rcu/rcuperf.c
>> +++ b/kernel/rcu/rcuperf.c
>> @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ MODULE_AUTHOR("Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>");
>>  #define VERBOSE_PERFOUT_ERRSTRING(s) \
>>       do { if (verbose) pr_alert("%s" PERF_FLAG "!!! %s\n", perf_type, s); } while (0)
>>
>> -torture_param(bool, gp_exp, false, "Use expedited GP wait primitives");
>> +torture_param(bool, gp_exp, true, "Use expedited GP wait primitives");
>
> This is fine as a convenience for internal testing, but the usual way
> to make this happen is using the rcuperf.gp_exp kernel boot parameter.
> Or was that not working for you?
>

Sure. It should work if rcuperf.gp_exp=1 is added to the .boot files
(it wouldn't work rcuperf.gp_exp=false is used).

Thanks,
Lihao.

>                                                         Thanx, Paul
>
>>  torture_param(int, holdoff, 10, "Holdoff time before test start (s)");
>>  torture_param(int, nreaders, -1, "Number of RCU reader threads");
>>  torture_param(int, nwriters, -1, "Number of RCU updater threads");
>> --
>> 2.14.1.729.g59c0ea183
>>
>