[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1516955899-31810-1-git-send-email-baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 16:38:19 +0800
From: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
To: rjw@...ysocki.net, khilman@...nel.org, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
len.brown@...el.com, pavel@....cz, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] base: power: domain: Replace mdelay with msleep
After checking all possible call chains to genpd_dev_pm_detach() and
genpd_dev_pm_attach() here,
my tool finds that these functions are never called in atomic context,
namely never in an interrupt handler or holding a spinlock.
Thus mdelay can be replaced with msleep to avoid busy wait.
This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself.
Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
---
drivers/base/power/domain.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/domain.c b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
index 0c80bea..f84ac72 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/domain.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
@@ -2144,7 +2144,7 @@ static void genpd_dev_pm_detach(struct device *dev, bool power_off)
if (ret != -EAGAIN)
break;
- mdelay(i);
+ msleep(i);
cond_resched();
}
@@ -2231,7 +2231,7 @@ int genpd_dev_pm_attach(struct device *dev)
if (ret != -EAGAIN)
break;
- mdelay(i);
+ msleep(i);
cond_resched();
}
mutex_unlock(&gpd_list_lock);
--
1.7.9.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists