linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the nvdimm tree with the powerpc tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180129170445.0e3cc514@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Mon, 29 Jan 2018 17:04:45 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        PowerPC <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the nvdimm tree with the powerpc tree

Hi Dan,

Today's linux-next merge of the nvdimm tree got a conflict in:

  arch/powerpc/sysdev/axonram.c

between commit:

  1d65b1c886be ("powerpc/cell: Remove axonram driver")

from the powerpc tree and commit:

  785a3fab4adb ("mm, dax: introduce pfn_t_special()")

from the nvdimm tree.

I fixed it up (I just removed the file) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell