lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4g2pfoe8bpVaKDyrVKJZwSN=+J4U=SvKrsa_mLyT_7pfg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 29 Jan 2018 14:49:52 -0800
From:   Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        PowerPC <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the nvdimm tree with the powerpc tree

On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 10:04 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the nvdimm tree got a conflict in:
>
>   arch/powerpc/sysdev/axonram.c
>
> between commit:
>
>   1d65b1c886be ("powerpc/cell: Remove axonram driver")
>
> from the powerpc tree and commit:
>
>   785a3fab4adb ("mm, dax: introduce pfn_t_special()")
>
> from the nvdimm tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I just removed the file) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.

Thanks Stephen, resolution looks good to me.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ