[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4g2pfoe8bpVaKDyrVKJZwSN=+J4U=SvKrsa_mLyT_7pfg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 14:49:52 -0800
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
PowerPC <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the nvdimm tree with the powerpc tree
On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 10:04 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the nvdimm tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/powerpc/sysdev/axonram.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 1d65b1c886be ("powerpc/cell: Remove axonram driver")
>
> from the powerpc tree and commit:
>
> 785a3fab4adb ("mm, dax: introduce pfn_t_special()")
>
> from the nvdimm tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I just removed the file) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.
Thanks Stephen, resolution looks good to me.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists