[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANjDDBiHoN05gy-gHtBiM_9k9HjmChcwHjCjTbsanD=X7qxPRw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 17:38:48 +0530
From: Devesh Sharma <devesh.sharma@...adcom.com>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc: linux-rdma <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Selvin Xavier <selvin.xavier@...adcom.com>,
Somnath Kotur <somnath.kotur@...adcom.com>,
Sriharsha Basavapatna <sriharsha.basavapatna@...adcom.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [0/2] RDMA/bnxt_re: Adjustments for bnxt_qplib_alloc_dpi_tbl()
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 3:01 PM, SF Markus Elfring
<elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>> You don't need 2 patches when changing same lines of code.
>
> Are these really the same?
>
>
>> Could you squash both and send your changes in a single patch.
>
> I prefer to keep the deletion of questionable error messages separate
> from the refactoring for a bit of exception handling.
>
Okay fair enough
Series Acked-By: Devesh Sharma <devesh.sharma@...adcom.com>
>
>> The patches look good to me otherwise.
>
> Thanks for your constructive feedback.
>
> Regards,
> Markus
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists