[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180130121611.GC26445@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 13:16:11 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>
Cc: mpe@...erman.id.au, mingo@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
corbet@....net, arnd@...db.de, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, x86@...nel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dave.hansen@...el.com,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
bsingharora@...il.com, hbabu@...ibm.com,
bauerman@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 27/27] mm: display pkey in smaps if
arch_pkeys_enabled() is true
On Thu 18-01-18 17:50:48, Ram Pai wrote:
[...]
> @@ -851,9 +848,13 @@ static int show_smap(struct seq_file *m, void *v, int is_pid)
> (unsigned long)(mss->pss >> (10 + PSS_SHIFT)));
>
> if (!rollup_mode) {
> - arch_show_smap(m, vma);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PKEYS
> + if (arch_pkeys_enabled())
> + seq_printf(m, "ProtectionKey: %8u\n", vma_pkey(vma));
> +#endif
> show_smap_vma_flags(m, vma);
> }
> +
Why do you need to add ifdef here? The previous patch should make
arch_pkeys_enabled == F when CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PKEYS=n. Btw. could you
merge those two patches into one. It is usually much easier to review a
new helper function if it is added along with a user.
> m_cache_vma(m, vma);
> return ret;
> }
> --
> 1.7.1
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists