[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VchRJzp1CM33q18e9x8Uq7bNrPZykz-GdpRgB3=y2C+KQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 18:40:16 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...23.retrosnub.co.uk>,
Jeremy Cline <jeremy@...ine.org>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Lars Kellogg-Stedman <lars@...bit.com>,
Steven Presser <steve@...ssers.name>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iio: accel: bmc150: Check for a second ACPI device for BOSC0200
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 6:01 PM, Jonathan Cameron
<Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 16:07:02 +0200
> Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
>> > But that would take much longer. Feel free to propose it and a patch
>> > removing the ifdef fun if you like!
>> Where can I see the patch?
> Doh. I clearly forgot to push out. Should be able to push to
> iio.git on kernel.org later.
Thanks, I can see it now.
This patch almost wrong. Not by functionality it brings, but by style.
I'll send soon a series of fixes to the driver (compile tested only)
to provide my view on the matters.
P.S. In the future (I have some kind of deja vu I have told this
already to someone), please, Cc one or more of Rafael, Mika and/or me
for ACPI matters.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists