[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vf==OQ=Cx4Nzrd+vAOJshT-oL6L8Y54aWt0cGyJJuacjg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 19:05:27 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...23.retrosnub.co.uk>,
Jeremy Cline <jeremy@...ine.org>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Lars Kellogg-Stedman <lars@...bit.com>,
Steven Presser <steve@...ssers.name>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iio: accel: bmc150: Check for a second ACPI device for BOSC0200
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 6:40 PM, Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 6:01 PM, Jonathan Cameron
> <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 16:07:02 +0200
>> Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
>
>>> > But that would take much longer. Feel free to propose it and a patch
>>> > removing the ifdef fun if you like!
>
>>> Where can I see the patch?
>
>> Doh. I clearly forgot to push out. Should be able to push to
>> iio.git on kernel.org later.
>
> Thanks, I can see it now.
>
> This patch almost wrong. Not by functionality it brings, but by style.
Oy vey, the second device is *not* accelerometer, it is a magnetometer [1].
[1]: https://www.mouser.com/ds/2/783/BST-BMC150-DS000-04-786477.pdf
> I'll send soon a series of fixes to the driver (compile tested only)
> to provide my view on the matters.
>
> P.S. In the future (I have some kind of deja vu I have told this
> already to someone), please, Cc one or more of Rafael, Mika and/or me
> for ACPI matters.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists