lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180130185131.GA16143@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 30 Jan 2018 19:51:31 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuahkh@....samsung.com,
        patches@...nelci.org, ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.18 00/52] 3.18.93-stable review

On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 03:51:56PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 06:19:15AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 01/29/2018 04:56 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.18.93 release.
> > > There are 52 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > > 
> > > Responses should be made by Wed Jan 31 12:36:07 UTC 2018.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > 
> > 
> > Build results:
> > 	total: 136 pass: 135 fail: 1
> > Failed builds:
> > 	um:defconfig
> > Qemu test results:
> > 	total: 112 pass: 112 fail: 0
> > 
> > The build failure is:
> > 
> > In file included from arch/um/kernel/config.c:8:0:
> > arch/um/include/shared/init.h:43:28: fatal error: linux/compiler.h: No such file or directory
> > 
> > [ several instances ]
> 
> Crap, I was trying to apply a number of the UM patches that Android
> relies on for their build systems that they patch their kernel for.
> I'll go look into those to try to figure out what I got wrong...

Ok, I can't even build a defconfig for ARCH=um at all, with no patches
applied to 3.18.  I had to go find a 4.9.4 kernel to even get close to
building, gcc7 did really odd things.

Do you have the .config file you use to build this arch with?  I looked
on the builder site and couldn't seem to find it anywhere, am I just
missing something obvious?

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ