linux-kernel - [tip:x86/pti] x86/syscall: Sanitize syscall table de-references under speculation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <tip-2fbd7af5af8665d18bcefae3e9700be07e22b681@git.kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 30 Jan 2018 14:37:14 -0800
From:   tip-bot for Dan Williams <tipbot@...or.com>
To:     linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     luto@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com,
        dan.j.williams@...el.com, mingo@...nel.org
Subject: [tip:x86/pti] x86/syscall: Sanitize syscall table de-references
 under speculation

Commit-ID:  2fbd7af5af8665d18bcefae3e9700be07e22b681
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/2fbd7af5af8665d18bcefae3e9700be07e22b681
Author:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
AuthorDate: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 17:02:59 -0800
Committer:  Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CommitDate: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 21:54:31 +0100

x86/syscall: Sanitize syscall table de-references under speculation

The syscall table base is a user controlled function pointer in kernel
space. Use array_index_nospec() to prevent any out of bounds speculation.

While retpoline prevents speculating into a userspace directed target it
does not stop the pointer de-reference, the concern is leaking memory
relative to the syscall table base, by observing instruction cache
behavior.

Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: alan@...ux.intel.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/151727417984.33451.1216731042505722161.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com

---
 arch/x86/entry/common.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/common.c b/arch/x86/entry/common.c
index 9908134..21dbdf0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/common.c
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
 #include <linux/export.h>
 #include <linux/context_tracking.h>
 #include <linux/user-return-notifier.h>
+#include <linux/nospec.h>
 #include <linux/uprobes.h>
 #include <linux/livepatch.h>
 #include <linux/syscalls.h>
@@ -282,7 +283,8 @@ __visible void do_syscall_64(struct pt_regs *regs)
 	 * regs->orig_ax, which changes the behavior of some syscalls.
 	 */
 	if (likely((nr & __SYSCALL_MASK) < NR_syscalls)) {
-		regs->ax = sys_call_table[nr & __SYSCALL_MASK](
+		nr = array_index_nospec(nr & __SYSCALL_MASK, NR_syscalls);
+		regs->ax = sys_call_table[nr](
 			regs->di, regs->si, regs->dx,
 			regs->r10, regs->r8, regs->r9);
 	}
@@ -318,6 +320,7 @@ static __always_inline void do_syscall_32_irqs_on(struct pt_regs *regs)
 	}
 
 	if (likely(nr < IA32_NR_syscalls)) {
+		nr = array_index_nospec(nr, IA32_NR_syscalls);
 		/*
 		 * It's possible that a 32-bit syscall implementation
 		 * takes a 64-bit parameter but nonetheless assumes that