[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180131100822.GL2269@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 11:08:22 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
stern@...land.harvard.edu, parri.andrea@...il.com,
j.alglave@....ac.uk, luc.maranget@...ia.fr, boqun.feng@...il.com,
will.deacon@....com, npiggin@...il.com, dhowells@...hat.com,
elena.reshetova@...el.com, mhocko@...e.com, akiyks@...il.com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL tools] Linux kernel memory model
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 10:00:06AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> - Similary, some of the high level descriptions in tools/memory-model/README
> should probably propagated into the source code files as well: for example
> both tools/memory-model/lock.cat and linux-kernel.cat could be improved that
> way.
This is something both Will and me have on our todo list, sadly we've
not had any time to work on this due to this pesky spectre crap.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists