[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180131235350.GH3741@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 15:53:50 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
parri.andrea@...il.com, j.alglave@....ac.uk, luc.maranget@...ia.fr,
boqun.feng@...il.com, will.deacon@....com, npiggin@...il.com,
dhowells@...hat.com, elena.reshetova@...el.com, mhocko@...e.com,
akiyks@...il.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL tools] Linux kernel memory model
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 11:08:22AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 10:00:06AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > - Similary, some of the high level descriptions in tools/memory-model/README
> > should probably propagated into the source code files as well: for example
> > both tools/memory-model/lock.cat and linux-kernel.cat could be improved that
> > way.
>
> This is something both Will and me have on our todo list, sadly we've
> not had any time to work on this due to this pesky spectre crap.
Spectre permitting, this would be very cool!
Thanx, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists