[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vc6S__Ovhka5DNUhVEiybDewqM9hvnhZw_1j9VTfq3kxw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 18:47:28 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Rajneesh Bhardwaj <rajneesh.bhardwaj@...el.com>,
Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Vishwanath Somayaji <vishwanath.somayaji@...el.com>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch v1 3/8] ACPI / LPIT: Export lpit_read_residency_count_address()
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 5:09 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 10:48 AM, Andy Shevchenko
> <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 10:58 AM, Rajneesh Bhardwaj
>> <rajneesh.bhardwaj@...el.com> wrote:
>>> From: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
>>>
>>> Export lpit_read_residency_count_address(), so that it can be used from
>>> drivers built as module. With the recent changes, the builtin_pci
>>> functionality of the intel_pmc_core driver is removed and now it can be
>>> built as a module to read this exported interface to calculate the PMC base
>>> address.
>>>
>>
>> This needs Ack from ACPI maintainer(s).
>>
>> Rafael, are you OK with exporting this method?
>
> I have no particular objection at this point.
I took it as an ACK.
Tell me if I'm wrong.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists