linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 10/41] clk: davinci: New driver for davinci PSC clocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8c0c10ec-c1ec-89b3-ae7b-2df61c22779a@ti.com>
Date:   Thu, 1 Feb 2018 15:25:07 +0530
From:   Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To:     David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
CC:     Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 10/41] clk: davinci: New driver for davinci PSC clocks

On Saturday 20 January 2018 10:43 PM, David Lechner wrote:
> This adds a new driver for mach-davinci PSC clocks. This is porting the
> code from arch/arm/mach-davinci/psc.c to the common clock framework and
> is converting it to use regmap to simplify the code. Additionally, it
> adds device tree support for these clocks.
> 
> Note: although there are similar clocks for TI Keystone we are not able
> to share the code for a few reasons. The keystone clocks are device tree
> only and use legacy one-node-per-clock bindings. Also the keystone
> driver makes the assumption that there is only one PSC per SoC and uses
> global variables, but here we have two controllers per SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>

Reviewed-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>

Thanks,
Sekhar