[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180201120643.3spdhgvudjk3eb3b@dell>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 12:06:43 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Enric Balletbo Serra <eballetbo@...il.com>
Cc: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
Linux PWM List <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] pwm-backlight: enable/disable the PWM
before/after LCD enable toggle.
On Tue, 30 Jan 2018, Enric Balletbo Serra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2017-12-01 13:06 GMT+01:00 Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>:
> > Before this patch the enable signal was set before the PWM signal and
> > vice-versa on power off. This sequence is wrong, at least, it is on
> > the different panels datasheets that I checked, so I inverted the sequence
> > to follow the specs.
> >
> > For reference the following panels have the mentioned sequence:
> > - N133HSE-EA1 (Innolux)
> > - N116BGE (Innolux)
> > - N156BGE-L21 (Innolux)
> > - B101EAN0 (Auo)
> > - B101AW03 (Auo)
> > - LTN101NT05 (Samsung)
> > - CLAA101WA01A (Chunghwa)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>
> > Acked-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
> > Acked-by: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>
> > ---
> > Changes since v4:
> > - Rebase on top of mainline.
> > - Add the acks from Daniel Thompson and Jingoo Han.
> > Changes since v3:
> > - List the part numbers for the panel checked (Daniel Thompson)
> > Changes since v2:
> > - Add this as a separate patch (Thierry Reding)
> > Changes since v1:
> > - None
> >
> > drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 9 +++++----
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> A gentle ping, It's been nearly two months since I sent this patchset,
> there is anything else that prevents these patches to land or
> incorporate in linux-next?
Looks like Daniel should Ack 2/5 since he had comments on it before
and it still lacks a Backlight Ack.
With regards to -next, the merge-window is open (should close in a
little over a week), so the chances are, you'll get a long soak before
the next merge-window opens.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists