[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180201134401.GE9182@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 13:44:01 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>
Cc: stern@...land.harvard.edu, peterz@...radead.org,
boqun.feng@...il.com, npiggin@...il.com, dhowells@...hat.com,
j.alglave@....ac.uk, luc.maranget@...ia.fr,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...nel.org, corbet@....net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] MAINTAINERS: add the Memory Consistency Model
subsystem
On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 01:04:26PM +0100, Andrea Parri wrote:
> Integrate (and then remove) tools/memory-model/MAINTAINERS into the
> main MAINTAINERS file. This way get_maintainer.pl can give a "right
> answer" for tools/memory-model/.
>
> Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> tools/memory-model/MAINTAINERS | 15 ---------------
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 tools/memory-model/MAINTAINERS
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Makes a lot more sense having this in the top-level MAINTAINERS file.
It might also make sense to add:
F: Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
as a separate patch now that we have a hit-list of memory model people
who can help poor old Jon (who currently gets blamed by get_maintainer.pl).
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists