[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180201193931.GA4537@andrea>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 20:39:31 +0100
From: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: stern@...land.harvard.edu, peterz@...radead.org,
boqun.feng@...il.com, npiggin@...il.com, dhowells@...hat.com,
j.alglave@....ac.uk, luc.maranget@...ia.fr,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...nel.org, corbet@....net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] MAINTAINERS: add the Memory Consistency Model
subsystem
On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 01:44:01PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 01:04:26PM +0100, Andrea Parri wrote:
> > Integrate (and then remove) tools/memory-model/MAINTAINERS into the
> > main MAINTAINERS file. This way get_maintainer.pl can give a "right
> > answer" for tools/memory-model/.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>
> > ---
> > MAINTAINERS | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> > tools/memory-model/MAINTAINERS | 15 ---------------
> > 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > delete mode 100644 tools/memory-model/MAINTAINERS
>
> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
>
> Makes a lot more sense having this in the top-level MAINTAINERS file.
> It might also make sense to add:
>
> F: Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
>
> as a separate patch now that we have a hit-list of memory model people
> who can help poor old Jon (who currently gets blamed by get_maintainer.pl).
This does make sense to me: I'll prepare/send such a patch tomorrow.
Andrea
>
> Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists