[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180204131515.GA2977@kroah.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 14:15:15 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Stanislav Nijnikov <Stanislav.Nijnikov@....com>
Cc: "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"jaegeuk@...nel.org" <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
Alex Lemberg <Alex.Lemberg@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/10] ufs: sysfs: attribute group for existing sysfs
entries.
On Sun, Feb 04, 2018 at 01:09:09PM +0000, Stanislav Nijnikov wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@...uxfoundation.org]
> > Sent: Sunday, February 4, 2018 2:34 PM
> > To: Stanislav Nijnikov <Stanislav.Nijnikov@....com>
> > Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> > jaegeuk@...nel.org; Alex Lemberg <Alex.Lemberg@....com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/10] ufs: sysfs: attribute group for existing sysfs
> > entries.
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 04, 2018 at 12:29:06PM +0000, Stanislav Nijnikov wrote:
> > > > > + curr_len += snprintf((buf + curr_len), (PAGE_SIZE - curr_len),
> > > > > + "\nAll available Runtime PM levels info:\n");
> > > > > + for (lvl = UFS_PM_LVL_0; lvl < UFS_PM_LVL_MAX; lvl++)
> > > > > + curr_len += snprintf((buf + curr_len), (PAGE_SIZE - curr_len),
> > > > > + "\tRuntime PM level [%d] => dev_state
> > > > [%s] link_state [%s]\n",
> > > > > + lvl,
> > > > > + ufschd_ufs_dev_pwr_mode_to_string(
> > > > > + ufs_pm_lvl_states[lvl].dev_state),
> > > > > + ufschd_uic_link_state_to_string(
> > > > > + ufs_pm_lvl_states[lvl].link_state));
> > > > > +
> > > >
> > > > sysfs if "one value per file", not "random text that someone has to
> > > > parse per file" please.
> > > >
> > > > Huge hint, if you ever care about checking the size of the sysfs
> > > > buffer you are writing into, you are doing something really really wrong.
> > > >
> > > Hi Greg
> > > It's the existing code, added by:
> > > commit 09690d5a6ae1b7e4cb5ac429c311b99d09352c12
> > > Author: subhashj@...eaurora.org <subhashj@...eaurora.org>
> > > Date: Thu Dec 22 18:41:00 2016 -0800
> > >
> > > scsi: ufs: provide sysfs attribute to select the PM level
> > >
> > > This patch provides the sysfs attribute to choose the power management
> > > level for UFS runtime and system suspend.
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Sujit Reddy Thumma <sthumma@...eaurora.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@...eaurora.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
> > >
> > > I just moved it to an another file and changed the sysfs entries
> > > creation by Jaegeuk Kim' request. At the moment the entry shows the PM
> > > level, the device state, the link state and all possible PM levels. Do you
> > want me to change it?
> >
> > Ah, you are just moving this code around. Ok, that's fine for this patch, but
> > please fix it up as part of this patch series because this isn't an acceptable
> > sysfs file at all. If it were documented that would be a lot more obvious as to
> > just how wrong it was :(
> >
> > And, as it wasn't documented, you can change it as it's obvious no one used it
> > :)
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> Can I fix these entries not in this patchset? As long as I know they are used and I
> would prefer that change of the existing sysfs entries behavior be related to a
> separate patch.
Ok, but it's nice to at least hope that someone will fix it up soon :)
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists