linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ASoC: codecs: Add support for AK5558 ADC driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 4 Feb 2018 16:31:50 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>,
        ALSA Development Mailing List <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        wakasugi.jb@...asahi-kasei.co.jp,
        "S.j. Wang" <shengjiu.wang@....com>,
        Mihai Serban <mihai.serban@...il.com>,
        Cosmin Samoila <cosmin.samoila@....com>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
        Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...il.com>,
        Mihai Serban <mihai.serban@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ASoC: codecs: Add support for AK5558 ADC driver

On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 1:11 AM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 09:33:18PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 6:20 PM, Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com> wrote:
>
>> > +static int ak5558_set_dai_mute(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, int mute)
>> > +{
>> > +       struct snd_soc_codec *codec = dai->codec;
>> > +       struct ak5558_priv *ak5558 = snd_soc_codec_get_drvdata(codec);
>>
>> > +       int ndt = 0;
>>
>> It might be even
>>
>>       int ndt = max(ak5558->fs ? 583000 / ak5558->fs : 5, 5);
>
> Please don't encourage people to use the ternery operator like that, it
> does nothing for legibility not to write out the conditionals.

Noted.

>> > +static const struct i2c_device_id ak5558_i2c_id[] = {
>> > +       { "ak5558", 0 },
>> > +       { }
>> > +};
>> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, ak5558_i2c_id);
>
>> I dunno if it's really helpful to have. Though it's up to Mark and you.
>
> I don't care either way.

Since Mark is okay with either, I would rather switch to ->probe_new()
and remove above table.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko