[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180205234120.GG9465@builder>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 15:41:20 -0800
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To: Srinivas Ramana <sramana@...eaurora.org>
Cc: linus.walleij@...aro.org, timur@...eaurora.org,
sboyd@...eaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: qcom: Add irq_enable callback for msm gpio
On Mon 22 Jan 05:03 PST 2018, Srinivas Ramana wrote:
> +static void msm_gpio_irq_enable(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> + struct msm_pinctrl *pctrl = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
> + const struct msm_pingroup *g;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + u32 val;
> +
> + g = &pctrl->soc->groups[d->hwirq];
> +
> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags);
> +
> + /*
> + * clear the interrupt status bit before unmask to avoid
> + * any erroneous interrupts that would have got latched
> + * when the intterupt is not in use.
> + */
> + val = readl(pctrl->regs + g->intr_status_reg);
> + val &= ~BIT(g->intr_status_bit);
> + writel(val, pctrl->regs + g->intr_status_reg);
> +
> + val = readl(pctrl->regs + g->intr_cfg_reg);
> + val |= BIT(g->intr_enable_bit);
> + writel(val, pctrl->regs + g->intr_cfg_reg);
> +
> + set_bit(d->hwirq, pctrl->enabled_irqs);
> +
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags);
> +}
Hi Srinivas,
This makes sense, but I would prefer if you extract this code into a
common:
static void __msm_gpio_irq_unmask(struct msm_pinctrl *pctrl, bool status_clear)
which you call from the two callbacks.
Regards,
Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists