[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <04ebd1d9-b45b-df87-d59e-1a3df97f3371@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 08:57:27 +0000
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To: Derek Basehore <dbasehore@...omium.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Soby.Mathew@....com, sudeep.holla@....com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
briannorris@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] cpu_pm: add syscore_suspend error handling
On 07/02/18 01:41, Derek Basehore wrote:
> If cpu_cluster_pm_enter() fails, cpu_pm_exit() should be called. This
> will put the CPU in the correct state to resume from the failure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Derek Basehore <dbasehore@...omium.org>
> ---
> kernel/cpu_pm.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cpu_pm.c b/kernel/cpu_pm.c
> index 67b02e138a47..03bcc0751a51 100644
> --- a/kernel/cpu_pm.c
> +++ b/kernel/cpu_pm.c
> @@ -186,6 +186,9 @@ static int cpu_pm_suspend(void)
> return ret;
>
> ret = cpu_cluster_pm_enter();
> + if (ret)
> + cpu_pm_exit();
> +
> return ret;
> }
>
>
It is unclear to me why we need this patch as part of the ITS series. I
probably fixes something for you, but I don't see the connection with
the other patches.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists