[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <FBF6DCBB-B0F5-446B-8FD1-106E2538A9C1@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 10:45:14 +0100
From: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
'Paolo Valente' via bfq-iosched
<bfq-iosched@...glegroups.com>,
Alban Browaeys <alban.browaeys@...il.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>, Ivan Kozik <ivan@...ios.org>,
SERENA ZIVIANI <169364@...denti.unimore.it>,
Serena Ziviani <ziviani.serena@...il.com>,
Holger Hoffstätte <holger@...lied-asynchrony.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH BUGFIX 1/1] block, bfq: add requeue-request hook
> Il giorno 07 feb 2018, alle ore 10:23, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de> ha scritto:
>
> On Wed, 2018-02-07 at 10:08 +0100, Paolo Valente wrote:
>>
>> The first piece of information I need is whether this failure happens
>> even without "BFQ hierarchical scheduling support".
>
> I presume you mean BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED, which I do not have enabled.
>
Great (so to speak), this saves us one step.
So, here's my next request for help: please apply the attached patch (compressed to preserve it from my email client) and retry. It adds several anomaly checks. I hope I have not added any false-positive check.
Thanks,
Paolo
Download attachment "0001-block-bfq-instrument-requeue-and-finish-request.patch.zip" of type "application/zip" (1500 bytes)
> -Mike
Powered by blists - more mailing lists