[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1517998516.6606.1.camel@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 11:15:16 +0100
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>
Cc: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
'Paolo Valente' via bfq-iosched
<bfq-iosched@...glegroups.com>,
Alban Browaeys <alban.browaeys@...il.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>, Ivan Kozik <ivan@...ios.org>,
SERENA ZIVIANI <169364@...denti.unimore.it>,
Serena Ziviani <ziviani.serena@...il.com>,
Holger Hoffstätte
<holger@...lied-asynchrony.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH BUGFIX 1/1] block, bfq: add requeue-request hook
On Wed, 2018-02-07 at 10:45 +0100, Paolo Valente wrote:
>
> > Il giorno 07 feb 2018, alle ore 10:23, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de> ha scritto:
> >
> > On Wed, 2018-02-07 at 10:08 +0100, Paolo Valente wrote:
> >>
> >> The first piece of information I need is whether this failure happens
> >> even without "BFQ hierarchical scheduling support".
> >
> > I presume you mean BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED, which I do not have enabled.
> >
>
> Great (so to speak), this saves us one step.
>
> So, here's my next request for help: please apply the attached patch
> (compressed to preserve it from my email client) and retry. It adds
> several anomaly checks. I hope I have not added any false-positive
> check.
kernel BUG at block/bfq-iosched.c:4742!
4742 BUG_ON(!(rq->rq_flags & RQF_ELVPRIV));
Powered by blists - more mailing lists