linux-kernel - [PATCH] lockd: make nlm_ntf_refcnt and nlm_ntf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed,  7 Feb 2018 10:29:47 +0000
From:   Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To:     "J . Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
        Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
        Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>,
        Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>,
        linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] lockd: make nlm_ntf_refcnt and nlm_ntf_wq static

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>

The variables nlm_ntf_refcnt and nlm_ntf_wq are local to the source and
do not need to be in global scope, so make them static.

Cleans up sparse warnings:
fs/lockd/svc.c:60:10: warning: symbol 'nlm_ntf_refcnt' was not declared.
Should it be static?
fs/lockd/svc.c:61:1: warning: symbol 'nlm_ntf_wq' was not declared.
Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
---
 fs/lockd/svc.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/lockd/svc.c b/fs/lockd/svc.c
index 9c36d614bf89..346ed161756d 100644
--- a/fs/lockd/svc.c
+++ b/fs/lockd/svc.c
@@ -57,8 +57,8 @@ static struct task_struct	*nlmsvc_task;
 static struct svc_rqst		*nlmsvc_rqst;
 unsigned long			nlmsvc_timeout;
 
-atomic_t nlm_ntf_refcnt = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
-DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(nlm_ntf_wq);
+static atomic_t nlm_ntf_refcnt = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
+static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(nlm_ntf_wq);
 
 unsigned int lockd_net_id;
 
-- 
2.15.1