linux-kernel - Re: [linus:master] BUILD REGRESSION a2e5790d841658485d642196dbb0927303d6c22f

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180207191007.GD25235@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Wed, 7 Feb 2018 20:10:07 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [linus:master] BUILD REGRESSION
 a2e5790d841658485d642196dbb0927303d6c22f

On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 08:06:51PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 11:01:29AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 10:38 AM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
> > > On 02/07/2018 10:13 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > >>
> > >> That said, intel only _documents_ UD2 (0f 0b).
> > >
> > > Intel Order Number: 325383-064US, October 2017, documents UD0, UD1, and UD2.
> > > Section A.2.5, Table A-1, says:
> > 
> > Ahh, I had an older version.
> > 
> > Looking at the latest one I can find (325462-065US), it does specify
> > that it has a modrm byte:
> > 
> >   0F FF /r   UD0 1 r32, r/m32
> > 
> > so I think that our opcode maps are wrong, and it's a bit dangerous to
> > put random constants right after the UD0.
> > 
> > Maybe we should make our use of UD0 have a third byte: add a harmless
> > modrm byte before the warning constants?
> > 
> > But yes, at least my objdump just thinks it's a bad 2-byte sequence,
> > and doesn't look at any modrm bytes at all.
> 
> Look what my objdump does:
> 
> $ objdump --version
> GNU objdump (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.29.90.20180122
> 
> $ objdump -dr defconfig-build/kernel/sched/core.o | grep ud0
>     183a:       0f ff 65 48             ud0    0x48(%rbp),%esp
>     1881:       0f ff c3                ud0    %ebx,%eax
>     18b1:       0f ff 89 c0 48 0f a3    ud0    -0x5cf0b740(%rcx),%ecx
>     1940:       0f ff 89 c0 48 0f a3    ud0    -0x5cf0b740(%rcx),%ecx
>     19c2:       0f ff 89 c0 48 0f a3    ud0    -0x5cf0b740(%rcx),%ecx
> 
> So yeah, we're screwed :-(
> 
> Adding a harmless modr/m to our UD0 would grow the kernel image. ARGGH

PeterA, at the time there was talk of arranging a single byte UD
instruction. Any luck arranging that?