[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180207191451.GC25201@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 20:14:51 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [linus:master] BUILD REGRESSION
a2e5790d841658485d642196dbb0927303d6c22f
On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 11:03:42AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 10:49 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> >
> > Right, we picked UD0 because we _thought_ everybody agreed it being 2
> > bytes, just like UD2. This is now not true anymore?
>
> Both UD0 and UD1 are documented to have modrm in the latest Intel SDM
> I can find (Order number 325462-065US, December 2017):
Thanks, and yes :/ They changed it in October17 (which I actually had a copy
of so I'm not sure why I was looking at March17).
Back when we did that patch the SDM didn't have that extra ModR/M on,
and binutils disassembled it as the 2 byte (bad) thing, which was all
good.
Then someone went and wrecked it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists