[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180210192136.GE4866@pd.tnic>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2018 20:21:36 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"# 3.4.x" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 46/92] x86/alternative: Print unadorned pointers
On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 11:14:18AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> I would just revert this commit from kernels earlier than 4.15; this
> %p usage is in debugging, so %pK doesn't make much sense here.
Yes, just drop it. That's only for debugging alternatives and not really
needed in stable.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists