[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180213091607.GA13711@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 10:16:07 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"# 3.4.x" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 46/92] x86/alternative: Print unadorned pointers
On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 08:21:36PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 11:14:18AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> > I would just revert this commit from kernels earlier than 4.15; this
> > %p usage is in debugging, so %pK doesn't make much sense here.
>
> Yes, just drop it. That's only for debugging alternatives and not really
> needed in stable.
Now dropped from 4.9.y and 4.14.y, thanks!
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists